Pacific whiting fishery seeks Alaska's RFM eco-label, the first assessment outside of the state

The certification program, which has existed for over two decades, is starting to expand beyond Alaska.

The US Pacific whiting fishery has entered into a new seafood certification assessment.
The US Pacific whiting fishery has entered into a new seafood certification assessment.Photo: NOAA

Alaska's Responsible Fisheries Management (RFM) sustainable seafood certification program is welcoming its first fishery outside of Alaska into its assessment process.

Assessment of the Pacific whiting fishery off the coasts of Washington and Oregon began Jan. 9, RFM Program Manager Jeff Regnart told IntraFish. The certification process could take between four and six months, he said.

Private consulting and auditing company MRAG Americas will conduct the assessment.

Once a fishery is certified to the RFM fisheries standard its certificate is good for five years. Each certified fishery enters annual surveillance audits for continuing certification.

"We hope that this is the first of many fisheries outside of Alaska to join the RFM program," Regnart said.

The US allocation for Pacific whiting in 2021 was set at 369,400 metric tons. A joint management agreement between Canada and the United States allocated nearly 74 percent of the Pacific whiting total allowable catch to the United States.

The Canada portion of the Pacific whiting fishery has not entered the RFM process, Regnart confirmed. Its certification currently comes from the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC).

The RFM program, which has been around since 2010, was finally offloaded in 2020 by the Alaska Seafood Marketing Institute (ASMI) to a nonprofit foundation outside of ASMI known as the Certified Seafood Collaborative (CSC).

Two of CSC's board members remain ASMI board members as well, and ASMI promotes the program on its own website.

An affordable alternative

Regnart said the RFM certification program is a more affordable option than programs such as the MSC because it does not require logo fees once a fishery is certified.

In contrast to RFM, the MSC charges 0.5 percent of net wholesale value to companies that use its logo, adding cost to the supply chain for those wanting to visually demonstrate sustainable seafood sourcing, according to CSC.

Decreasing assessment costs over the five-year fishery assessment cycle, expanding use of the program and the new RFM logo, and certifying fisheries outside of Alaska all have been goals of the program under the CSC.

To further increase the affordability of RFM, the Alaska program said it has adopted a joint chain-of-custody with Iceland, which has its own RFM certification program. Both programs follow the same UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) documents and have been benchmarked by the Global Sustainable Seafood Initiative (GSSI).

Last March, The Norwegian Responsible Fisheries Management (NRFM) standard, funded by the Norwegian Seafood Research Fund (FHF), started developing a sustainability standard for Norwegian fisheries based on Norway-specific conditions similar to Alaska's RFM program.
(Copyright)